
Per-Wavelength Compensation Schemes for CD
Francis Audet, Senior Product Manager, Optical Business Unit
The bandwidth increase from 10 Gbit/s to 40 Gbit/s has accommodated the
demand for greater speed, yet along with this increase come a number of issues.
As previously explored in this series, the main issues that arise are the
increase in chromatic dispersion (CD) and the decrease in CD tolerance, which
can lead to non-linear effects (e.g., four-wave mixing, self-phase and cross-phase
modulation, etc.). To deal with these issues, compensation schemes that make
up for CD are of the utmost importance when implementing a 40 Gbit/s network.
High-speed networks such as 40 Gbit/s networks carry dense wavelength-division
multiplexing (DWDM) signals, in which each wavelength has a different CD
coefficient. Therefore, compensating for an average value will result in
huge and random over-compensation or, far worse, under-compensation. Since
the relation between CD and CD tolerance is so close, the compensation applied
must be perfect in order for the signal to reach the receiver in a useable
format.
We know that CD tolerance is dependent on numerous factors such as bit rate
and channel count, among others. The total all-optical distance and the fiber
type dictate the accuracy level of the compensation that is required. In
addition, the input power is a main contributor to non-linear effects, so
that higher power must be accompanied by controlled, non-zero leftover dispersion.
Modulation formats for overcoming CD were discussed in our previous article
(CS-RZ, duo-binary and DPSK).

Figure 1: Eye diagram of perfectly compensated slope
versus averaged value.
Compensation Schemes
There are two main schemes that can be considered for CD compensation at
40 Gbit/s, and both must ensure per-wavelength tunable compensation.
While more complex and expensive than using the negative-fiber technique,
these schemes can be tailored to the exact required value per wavelength
and can be adapted if the dispersion within the fiber changes (e.g.,
caused by temperature changes).
Scheme 1: Many Rough Compensators and One Tunable Compensator
The simplest scheme (shown in Figure 2) consists of having a rough compensator
at each regeneration site to bring the CD within reasonable values, and
then placing a tunable compensator before the receiver. Since the range
of accumulated CD varies, the tunable dispersion-compensating module
(DCM) plays a critical role and must have a broad tenability range.

Figure 2: Rough - 1500 ps/nm at each site with a tunable
compensator at the end.
The weakness of this scenario comes with the advent of reconfigurable optical
add/drop multiplexers (ROADMs). With ROADMs, wavelengths with non-optimized
compensation can be re-routed onto other networks, or they can enter your
network at various places/times, and with various CDs. This puts even more
stress on the tunable modules at the receiving end, provided they can supply
the tunable range required (since non-compensated wavelengths could enter
the network).
Scheme 2: Tunable Compensators at Each Site
A more robust, yet complex and expensive scenario, is to have tunable compensators
at every site, guaranteeing that the dropped and added wavelengths are
always within a known CD range.
Negative Pre-Chirp
It is well known that properly adjusted negative pre-chirp can cancel
pulse spreading caused by CD. Negative pre-chirping involves red-shifting
the high frequencies and blue-shifting the low ones. This allows the
pulse to travel a longer distance before reaching the maximum acceptable
level of CD, as shown in the figure below:
Figure 3: Power and dispersion as a function of distance in a negative pre-chirp simulation.
The following figure shows the gain in distance by applying negative pre-chirp,
as well as over-compensation at each DCM site:

Figure 4: Distance versus launch conditions.
As we have seen in this article, negative pre-chirping as a compensation scheme
is a helpful method, yet it does have limitations and some sort of compensation
must be applied to the negative pre-chirp.
In the next edition, we will examine the PMD issues related to 40 Gbit/s transmission. |